Searching For The Pro-Death Candidate

Maybe someone can explain Howard Dean’s incomprehensible position on the death penalty. He and John Kerry apparently think only child murderers, cop-killers and (now) terrorists should be eligible for the death penalty. I understand that crimes that target children are particularly heinous, but how’s the rest of that work?

This position is liberal straddling at its worst, and will be a disaster should Dean or Kerry become the Democratic nominee. After all, how does one justify stricter punishment for killing a cop than, say, a schoolteacher, marine, firefighter or paramedic? What makes the killing of one adult worse than the killing of another? The position is indefensible.

I wish these candidates would grow some cajones and take a principled stand on the issue. Either oppose the death penalty altogether or support it for the crime of murder. In any case, don’t start dividing people into classes because a public furor makes it politically expedient (Polly Klass, 9/11, etc.).

My position? Those who intentionally kill others, even in crimes of passion, have given up their own right to life. Period. See? It’s that easy.

This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.